Sunday, September 25, 2022
Google search engine
HomeEntertainmentThe comprehensive comparison between Rumford act and Unruh

The comprehensive comparison between Rumford act and Unruh

The use and development of the Rumford Act, another of the famous Georgist deeds, was a strong influence in the furthering of Henry George’s theory of land value taxation. The Rumford Act established a method of taxation free from political obstruction that was designed to protect particular interests against the general body. Although this poor act was not directly concerned with land tax, it established a precedent that would help achieve the desired result and it did so with great speed. In this article with the help of California Business Lawyer & Corporate Lawyer, Inc. We will explain the the Rumford act vs Unruh for detailed information in better way.

Rumford Act:

After a complaint is filed, the State Fair Employment Practices Commission (sometimes referred to as the FEPC) is tasked with enforcing compliance with the Rumford Fair Housing Act (Health & Safety Code 35700, et seq.; hereinafter referred to as the Fair Housing Act), which is an exercise of the police power for the protection of the welfare, health, and peace of the people of the state ( 35700). § 35730.

Only public assisted housing accommodations and private dwellings with more than four units are protected from discrimination under the Rumford Fair Housing Act (Health & Saf. Code, 35700- 35744). (Sections 35710, 35720, Health & Safety Code)

The Rumford Act said, “The practise of discrimination because of race, colour, religion, natural origin, or ancestry is proclaimed to be against public policy” and barred racial discrimination in the sale or rental of any private home with more than four units. The State Fair Employment Practices Commission was given the authority to enforce the law. Housing discrimination was to be addressed by civil litigation under the Hawkins and Unruh Civil Rights Acts, while job discrimination was to be handled through administrative channels. Fair Employment Practice Com. (1971) 6 Cal.3d 205, 214 (hereinafter Stearns); see Burks v. Poppy Construction Co., supra, 57 Cal.2d 463) However, defendants may utilize a number of procedural tricks to increase the expense of litigation beyond what the plaintiff is likely to obtain, which is especially problematic in housing violation cases where civil damages frequently amount to less than $1,000 (Stearns, supra). The legislature recognised this problem and in 1963 passed the Rumford Fair Housing Act (former Health & Saf. Code, 35700 et seq., enacted by Stats. 1963, ch. 1853, 2-4, pp. 3823-3830), which provided a new administrative remedy for housing discrimination and broadened the scope of the housing discrimination prohibitions. References: (Stearns, supra, 6 Cal.3d at p. 214; Dyna-Med, supra, 43 Cal.3d at p.

Unruh Act:

The Unruh Civil Rights Act, codified at Title 51 of the California Civil Code, states that “all persons within the jurisdiction of this State are free and equal, and regardless of race, color, religion, ancestry, or national origin are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments of every kind whatsoever.” Before the Unruh Act was passed in 1959, Section 51 of the California Civil Code read as follows: “The Legislature of the State of California thus expresses its intent not to restrict the behavior of property owners in choosing their purchasers or renters on the basis of race, color, or creed.” In 1959, the California State Legislature passed the Unruh Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race or religion in “business enterprises of any sort whatsoever,” including real estate agents, property managers, and landlords. (Burks v. Poppy Constr. Co., 57 Cal.2d 463, 468.)

Documentary Evidence of California’s Constitution Article I, section 1, when read in conjunction with section 26, currently has the same meaning as it had before the passage of laws (the Unruh and Rumford Acts, above) granting the right to acquire property in certain situations without regard to race or religion.

Final Words:

Go for the What is hostile work environment? If you want to learn more about California law. After a complaint is filed, the State Fair Employment Practices Commission (FEPC) is tasked with enforcing compliance with the Rumford Fair Housing Act. In 1959, the California State Legislature passed the Unruh act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race or religion in business enterprises. After a complaint is filed, the State Fair Employment Practices Commission (FEPC) is tasked with enforcing compliance with the Rumford Fair Housing Act. The Rumford Act barred racial discrimination in the sale or rental of any private home with more than four units. It also prohibited housing discrimination under the Hawkins and Unruh Civil Rights Acts.

read more

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments